14-11-2018, 07:16 | #61 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Let's flip this round a bit. Question for those who can justify seeing a Mistress whilst in a vanilla relationship; How would you feel if you suddenly found out your partner had been out to, say, swinging parties, and when questioned said it didn't affect her love for you, was just sex, and just an urge she sometimes gets that has always been with her? Would the fact that actual penetrative sex was involved make it worse than you seeing a Mistress? Does the fact that there are no emotions involved make it easier to deal with or harder? What if, like Lisal and his Mistress, she had also built up a strong friendship with one of more of the men as well? Last edited by Ogden McNit; 14-11-2018 at 07:19. |
|
14-11-2018, 08:53 | #62 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 11,279
Reputation: 973
|
Quote:
I think that is fair enough. It does depend on the overall relationship - and if you have children etc. The issue for many is going to be more about the deceit than "unusual sex". Having said that a number of my female friends were very supportive of Mosley at the time of the scandal. They said they could understand the need to do something that could not be provided at home. They would prefer not to know, though! Last edited by Lisal; 14-11-2018 at 09:49. |
|
14-11-2018, 21:38 | #63 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: London
Posts: 377
Reputation: 123
|
I know this conversation isn't about race but why would you even feel the need to say this? You could have said you take issue with whatever it is he supposedly posted on Twitter. However, you felt the need to throw in black women then in a later post the N word masked as Niger (sure you meant the country). Now what I want to know is why black women? Is the person you're taking umbrage with a black woman? Last time I checked he isn't. So while I don't appreciate this thread going away from the OP I must ask why. Do black women come to the forefront of your mind due to a past experience? Otherwise, I see no reason why you even had to bring us into the conversation. You could have made your point without making yourself look like you have deep seeded issues with black women.
Quote:
__________________
http://www.mistress-esme.com/ |
|
14-11-2018, 21:44 | #64 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 7,221
Reputation: 108
|
Mmmmmmm. The urge to session is symptomatic of a wider problem in a persons life.
Or words to that affect. The urge to kill someone outside of a marital relationship maybe suggests a problem too. Or perhaps just wanting to go to the pub every day. Crikey the list is endless. Easy for me to say. I shot the wife, blamed the kids and then went for a session.
__________________
A girls gotta have somewhere to park her bike. |
14-11-2018, 21:57 | #65 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: London
Posts: 377
Reputation: 123
|
I have met married men who are in very honest and open relationships. Their partner is aware of what they are doing and is ok with it. Kink isn't for them. I have actually met some of their wives and it's rather refreshing. Then you have those who do it in secret for various reasons. I won't go into the various reasons. I am sure some of you have your own. I found that some are more comfortable (compartmentalising) than others but ultimately deep down(in my opinion) they know their significant other wouldn't be happy about it or they themselves aren't comfortable with their own kinks.
Quote:
__________________
http://www.mistress-esme.com/ |
|
14-11-2018, 21:58 | #66 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: London
Posts: 377
Reputation: 123
|
You're truly your own brand of special.
Quote:
__________________
http://www.mistress-esme.com/ |
|
14-11-2018, 22:21 | #67 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Years ago the number of men whose wives were aware of their Mistress visits would have been few and far between. I think it's great that there are happily married couples who can be open about this, it's such a healthy thing if both partners can just accept it and not analyse it too much. Lucky men. The 'compartmentalising' approach may work in the short term, but it's just asking for trouble long term IMO. Last edited by Ogden McNit; 14-11-2018 at 22:27. |
|
14-11-2018, 22:46 | #68 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Well said Mistress. Very odd comments, and nothing whatsoever to do with the OP. |
|
15-11-2018, 07:43 | #69 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: In t'North of t'Country
Posts: 5,511
Reputation: 160
|
On reflection.
Quote:
Ogden has problems with the opinions of what he perceives belong to those of old white men, which he then happily ridicules by collectively calling such people ‘Gammons’ due to the fact they (to him) look like pieces of pink boiled pig meat i.e. the name is a piss take of their skin colour. This is racist and I was demonstrating it by holding up a word mirror and pointing out that hypothetically were I, for instance, to reflect the situation and instead of taking the piss out of old white men and calling them a skin colour related insult chose to make a post which took the piss out of young black women (i.e. the opposites of ‘old’, ‘white’ and ‘men’) and ignorantly called them a name which insulted their niger* skin colour then it would very rightly be considered as racist. You are a young black woman and I am presuming you would consider it a racial slur to have your opinions thusly denigrated as collectively belonging to those of a ‘Chocolate Brownie’. By rightly taking issue with such a potential insult, as you and I probably do, it serves to prove by symmetry the racist equivalence of:- Old + White + Man = ‘G word’ => RACIAL BIGOTRY <= ‘N word’ = Woman + Black + Young. Please be assured I have no such issues and absolutely no desires to make the reflected racist ‘Brownie’ post, I was merely using the idea to highlight the inherent and logically equivalent racism in Ogden’s persistent obsession. This thread is at least the third recent thread in which he has spuriously thrown in his insults. I can’t imagine what horrors were visited upon the McNit household when he was growing up, but I can only guess he suffered terribly as a child when forced to eat platefuls of boiled ham whilst made to watch Question Time on a high contrast Black and White telly. He seems to have been traumatised ever since and is now blind to the resulting porcine psychosis. This presents in the form of a sort of meat based Tourette’s Syndrome with random outbursts of the ‘G word’ and the related ‘B word’ that need checking lest we become passively accepting of all similar and symmetrically equivalent ‘N word’ world insults. The observed symmetry is difficult to break and so long as Ogden (and others) choose to think it acceptable and funny to collectively call old white men ‘Gammons’ then it leaves the door open for an ugly P to N conversion, and so onto ‘Piggers’ and ‘Pig-Pogs’, and then the reintroduction of their equivalents. As I said, thank you for picking up on the point. Although now it is no doubt going to again derail this thread (and other future threads) until it is tackled. Tackle it we must, because accepting it is not acceptable unless we accept both image and reflection. Kind Regards, The Fireman. * Niger - Latin adjective for Black, and origin of the ‘N-word’ pejorative.
__________________
Light, Life, Love. 🌈 Trans-women are not women…they are men with a mental disorder. Protect women. “You [Rimmer] are truly a master amongst masters...” Ex Nihilo, UK-M. “Freedom only to speak inoffensivley is not worth having.” https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/...e-judgment.pdf “If a man can be a woman, there's no such thing as a woman.” “LGBTQIA2S+ ? Everything after the B is either fake, fashion, or illness.” Last edited by Slutty Rimmer; 15-11-2018 at 08:27. |
|
15-11-2018, 09:38 | #70 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 7,221
Reputation: 108
|
Quote:
Perhaps we could lead on to other parts of the debate and suggest if there were no pro doms to visit. Then people would be happier in their relationships. No enticement, no urge. Load of rubbish of course. I meant what I said not what our Mistress Esme said. I get the idea that what Oggy suggests is partnerships or marital relationships viewed through rose tinted glasses. Ok to play away if your single but not when your supposed to be monogamous. Or have I got that wrong again. I do sometimes. I recall it was four years ago this week I got something wrong. Hard to believe I know. But hey. I’m not perfect.
__________________
A girls gotta have somewhere to park her bike. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|