Ejaculating

[Gaz Up North]

Originally Posted by michele

I was talking to a retired nurse earlier today who told me males should ejaculate every day for health reasons. She was quite insistent about it. Something to do with bacteria and the prostrate apparently

Music to my ears - Licence to wank!

[Knickered]

It's odd, although I guess it's not really odd, more to do with getting older, but when I was sessioning I used to try not to come for around one week prior to the session, just so there was more to come out. Today, things are different. I think I could go for months without coming, certainly weeks, and I feel a bit down about the whole thing. I actually come once a week when there's nobody around except for my partner and I and she then facesits me and makes me come, but the erections aren't as strong as they used to be; don't get me wrong, I still wake up once or twice a week with a huge boner, but oddly, if I was then offered a hand job, the moment it was offered, my dick would start to shrink. Somebody told me it was psychological, which is really annoying and oddly again, when I'm out of the country and in a hotel room alone it seems to work fine. But now I'm ejaculating around once a week and it's never hard when it comes unless I wank myself, which I don't like doing because it's always sod's law, ie I wank myself and then I get offered a wank or suddenly we're alone in the house and I'm offered a smothering, so I leave myself alone and while, 'in the old days' I couldn't last more than a week without coming, these days a fortnight would be easy, three weeks, a month, also easy. I've toyed with the idea of seeing a doctor, but I don't feel it's necessary and I think taking Viagra is cheating. Besides, sod's law would kick in again, ie I take some Viagra and then the person who I thought had left the house has returned and (I'm guessing) I'd be left with a hard-on whilst sitting in front of the television watching the One Show or Pointless Celebrities. So, yes, once a week and I really look forward to it: edge-of-bed facesitting. Something else, there's nowhere near as much semen as there used to be and that bothers me too, but I'm guessing it's age, although I hate to admit it. I reckon the longer I leave it the more chance of a harder cock and, as I say, I often wake up with a huge one, so huge that I feel I have to boast to my partner if only to prove that it's not always a semi. Sometimes, like now, I think I'll go upstairs and play around with it, see if works better than, say, earlier, but then I think no, I can't be bothered. It tends to work better if I've been in bed, in the warmth, and I've noticed also that my cock is often cold at the tip (I hear this is a circulation issue) which is odd as I'm not unfit or overweight or anything. The only time it's not cold is when I'm in bed and that's the best time in terms of having a hard-on. Does anybody else have the same experience? I used to session but don't anymore, although some times I've wondered whether it would work if I did session, I don't know. Would love to know that I'm not alone.

[Slutty Rimmer]

Originally Posted by Knickered

…and I think taking Viagra is cheating. Besides, sod's law would kick in again, ie I take some Viagra and then the person who I thought had left the house has returned and (I'm guessing) I'd be left with a hard-on whilst sitting in front of the television watching the One Show or Pointless Celebrities.

Viagra doesn’t work quite like that Knickered. The viagra doesn’t enforce an erection irrespective of the circumstances, but rather it enables an erection if needed. You still need to be in the mood and feeling aroused to get the old spam canon in range.

Of course, this doesn’t necessarily preclude you sitting there in front of the TV under the circumstances you describe with a statuesque boner. I suppose that rather depends if either Alex Jones or Alexander Armstrong do it for you.

Yesterday The Lady and I were reminiscing about the year just gone and we realised I had only been allowed 2 orgasms all year. Once on my Birthday and then again when I was allowed to say a fond farewell to her original issue breasts the day before she went to have a boob job.

She mused that she had been far too generous to her slut and so intends to reduce my orgasms this year, just to prevent me from getting complacent ! I noted she also dropped into the conversation that her boyfriend-partner was allowed about 40 or 50 orgasms last year. Too much, less is definitely more.

Kind Regards,
Rimmer.

[Knickered]

Just two in a year? I probably would have had a wank or two and not told her. Definitely not Armstrong, or, for that matter, Alex Jones (not sure if I have a favourite female TV presenter, although there's a weather presenter on ITV's London News that fits the bill.

I didn't know that about V, I always thought that once taken you then spent hours with a huge and embarassing erection until it wore off. Hey ho!

Thanks for the reply, well-written as always.

[geordiesouth]

Slutty is correct. V or whatever else it’s called. There seems so many now.
Assists, but does not miraculously afford one a huge boner at the swallow of a tab.

I’ve used them. They seemed to work ok. But after many chats with GP about this one and that one. This colour and that strength etc etc.
I still couldn’t get away from the after shock headache and the even worse sinus trouble.

I can’t be arsed to put up with it to honest. Sometimes I shag. Sometimes I don’t. I can still enjoy the proceedings thanks very much and as I don’t particularly feel the need to perform like the stud I was once anymore. No more pills for me.
(Yes that’s right. I said stud. It was on a winters day 1994. Frozen stiff I was)

Anyways. Nuff said.

[ex nihilo]

The PDE-5 inhibitors (the ending in 'fil' drugs) only work with sexual stimulation. So, if lack of libido is caused by low free testosterone levels or psychological problems, the medication will be ineffective. They will never be as effective as a hot 25 year old girlfriend. Thank goodness !

The corpus is rich in the enzyme PDE-5, so if you competitively inhibit its physiological activity, it enables a pathway for greater signalling of nitrous oxide (NO, the grow a stalk molecule) which enhances blood flow into it...

[linewritingfan]

The debate between 'seed retention' vs 'regular ejaculation' to promote good health rages on.

I have not ejaculated for nearly a year (May 2022). Due to my hypnosis training I could not even if I wanted to. I can't find any health risks associated with 'never ejaculating again' but do feel some prosthatic tension so to speak?

[ex nihilo]

Available evidence would suggest that semen churn is better than not. Mountain stream with a constant flow appears healthier than an oxbow lake.

Ejaculation may protect the prostate gland by flushing out harmful chemicals that build up in semen.

From : “The Harvard ejaculation study:

The Health Professionals Follow-Up Study has been collecting information about a large group of volunteers since 1986. All the men are health care providers, including dentists, pharmacists, veterinarians, optometrists, ophthalmologists, and podiatrists. Most are white. In 1992, 29,342 men between the ages of 46 and 81 provided information about their average number of ejaculations per month in young adulthood (age 20–29), middle age (40–49), and in the most recent year. Ejaculations included sexual intercourse, nocturnal emissions, and masturbation. The volunteers provided comprehensive health and lifestyle data every two years until the study concluded in 2000.

The scientists found no evidence that frequent ejaculations mark an increased risk of prostate cancer. In fact, the reverse was true: High ejaculation frequency was linked to a decreased risk. Compared to men who reported 4–7 ejaculations per month across their lifetimes, men who ejaculated 21 or more times a month enjoyed a 31% lower risk of prostate cancer. And the results held up to rigorous statistical evaluation even after other lifestyle factors and the frequency of PSA testing were taken into account.”

[linewritingfan]

Hmm, my further research has concluded that semen retention is in fact very beneficial and does NOT result in risk to the prostate.